Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the extent and nature of the prosecution's cross-examination of the defense witness compromised the presumption of his innocence. This issue is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in determining that any potential prejudice to the defendant was outweighed by the probative value of the evidence obtained...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.