VOLK v. MLD HOME REMODELING CORP.


237 A.D.2d 432 (1997)

655 N.Y.S.2d 961

Jack Volk et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. Mld Home Remodeling Corp. et al., Respondents, and Melvin Ditkowich, Respondent-Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Joyce Contracting, Inc., Appellant, v. Jack Volk et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.) Jack Volk, Appellant, v. Ross, Suchoff & Taroff, P. C., Respondent. (Action No. 3.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 17, 1997


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the trial court that the plaintiffs in Action Nos. 1 and 3 and the plaintiff in Action No. 2 did not sustain their burdens of proof, which was based primarily on a determination that the testimony they presented was not credible, is entitled to great deference (see, Matter of Scheriff v Scheriff, 221 A.D.2d 450; 160 Chambers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases