BURBACH v. ARMSTRONG RIGGING AND ERECTING

No. C2-96-1634.

560 N.W.2d 107 (1997)

Alfred BURBACH, Respondent, v. ARMSTRONG RIGGING AND ERECTING, INC., a Minnesota corporation, Defendant, v. CAROLINA CASUALTY, a foreign corporation, garnishee, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 4, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. Tamborino, Sahr, Kunert & Tamborino, Minneapolis, for Respondent.

Robert M. McGuire, Andrea E. Reisbord, Cousineau, McGuire & Anderson, Chartered, Minneapolis, for Appellant.

Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, P.J., and KLAPHAKE and FORSBERG, JJ.


OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Alfred Burbach sued Armstrong Rigging and Erecting (Armstrong) for personal injuries that were allegedly caused by an Armstrong employee. Armstrong and its insurer, Continental Casualty (Continental), settled with Burbach pursuant to a so-called Miller-Shugart agreement, whereby Burbach released his claims against Armstrong and Continental and agreed to pursue his action solely...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases