CARROLL v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. B112393.

60 Cal.App.4th 606 (1997)

COLLEEN CARROLL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

December 30, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Lippman & Weisel and Harry S. Lippman, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

De Witt W. Clinton, County Counsel, and Owen L. Gallagher, Principal Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

NOTT, J.

This appeal presents the question of whether a paved bicycle path qualifies as a "trail" under the immunity provisions of Government Code section 831.4.1 We hold that it does, and affirm the judgment that was entered in favor of respondent County of Los Angeles (the County) against appellant Colleen Carroll.

FACTS

The South Bay Bicycle Path (the Path) stretches along...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases