Ordered that the judgment, as resettled, is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
There is no merit to the appellant's contention that the court erred in charging the jury that the appellant had drafted the commission agreement and that any ambiguities in the document should be construed against the drafter. Apparently recognizing that if the agreement here were viewed as unambiguous it would be read to the appellant's detriment, the appellant itself argued that the agreement...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
