ROBERT W. HAYMAN, INC. v. ACME CARRIERS, INC.


303 N.J. Super. 355 (1997)

ROBERT W. HAYMAN, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ACME CARRIERS, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND RAMON PEREZ, DEFENDANT, AND CHUBB & SON, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 18, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph B. Tiboni, attorney for appellant Acme Carriers, Inc. (Mr. Tiboni, on the brief and reply letter brief).

Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, attorneys for respondent Chubb & Son, Inc. (Gregory J. Romano, on the brief).

Saiber Schlesinger Satz & Goldstein, attorneys for respondent Robert W. Hayman, Inc. (Robert B. Nussbaum, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, STERN and HUMPHREYS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by STERN, J.A.D.

Pursuant to leave granted, defendant Acme Carriers, Inc. (Acme) appeals from the denial of its motion to compel defendant Chubb & Sons (Chubb) to provide a defense, and the granting of Chubb's cross-motion for summary judgment against plaintiff and Acme, relieving Chubb of any obligation under its policy. The motion judge found that an exclusion in the policy for theft by an employee of the insured

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases