PHAM v. NGUYEN

Docket No. G019481.

54 Cal.App.4th 11 (1997)

MICHAEL PHAM, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MAI-THI THI NGUYEN, Defendant and Appellant. YEN HOANG PHAM, Plaintiff, v. MAI-THI THI NGUYEN, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

April 4, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Dale J. Peroutka for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

SILLS, P.J.

In this case we affirm a judgment after the trial court denied a continuance request stipulated to in writing by both parties. The appellant relies on a little-known statute, section 595.2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which on its face requires the trial court to continue trials, or the hearing of any motion or demurrer, when the parties agree in writing to such a postponement. As we explain below, the statute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases