McMILLAN v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

No. 3:96-1227-19BC.

16 F.Supp.2d 635 (1997)

Arthur McMILLAN, Plaintiff, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division.

September 2, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert W. Louthian, Louthian and Louthian, Columbia, SC, for plaintiff.

Arthur McMillan, Columbia, SC, pro se.

Michael Hart Montgomery, Lide Montgomery Potts and Medlock PC, Columbia, SC, Stephan V. Futeral, Finkel, Altman & Bailey, Charleston, SC, Thomas Travis Medlock, Columbia, SC, for defendant.


ORDER

SHEDD, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation ("the Report") filed by United States Magistrate Judge Joseph R. McCrorey, to whom this case had previously been assigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 73.02(B)(2) (D.S.C.). In the Report, Magistrate Judge McCrorey recommends that the Court grant defendant's motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has filed objections to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases