1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 297 N.J.
  5. 297 N.J. Super. 353 (1997)
 

KOPIN v. ORANGE PRODUCTS, INC.

297 N.J. Super. 353 (1997)

DAVID KOPIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ORANGE PRODUCTS, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 10, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Judson A. Parsons, Jr. argued the cause for appellant.

James A. Plaisted argued the cause for respondent (Walder, Sondak & Brogan, attorneys; Mr. Plaisted, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, MUIR, Jr. and COBURN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

The plaintiff David Kopin appeals from a summary judgment of the Law Division in favor of defendant Orange Products, Inc. that dismissed his action to recover damages on a theory of quantum meruit for business suggestions he made while employed by defendant.

Accepting plaintiff's proofs presented on the summary judgment motion, it appears that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases