Appellate Court of Connecticut.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued March 19, 1997.
Officially released September 9, 1997.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Richard T. Meehan, Jr., with whom, on the brief, was Richard T. Meehan, Sr., for the appellant (defendant).
Judith Rossi, assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Eugene Callahan, state's attorney, and James Bernardi, assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).
Landau, Schaller and Spear, Js.
Appellate Court of Connecticut.
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant appeals1 from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a). The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) failed to prohibit, sua sponte, the parties from employing "hypothetical" questions during voir dire, (2) concluded that the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to prove the defendant's guilt...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.