The claims for negligence and strict products liability for design defect were properly dismissed as against defendant and third-party plaintiff upon the basis of uncontroverted evidence that plaintiff's employer had substantially altered the machine by removing a key safety feature, and that the accident would not have occurred had the machine been left as originally designed and manufactured (see, Robinson v Reed-Prentice Div.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.