SARNO v. COURT ST. INVESTORS


240 A.D.2d 391 (1997)

658 N.Y.S.2d 1021

James Sarno, Appellant, v. Court Street Investors et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 2, 1997


Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court correctly charged the jury that in order to find the respondents negligent it must find that they had actual or constructive notice of the unsafe condition. The court properly refused to charge the jury regarding vicarious liability (cf., Thomassen v J & K Diner, 152 A.D.2d 421).

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases