Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
There is no merit to the defendant's contention that the court erred in granting the plaintiff summary judgment because the defendant mortgagor tranferred the subject property and assigned his mortgage to a third party. The alleged transfer and assumption did not release the mortgagor from his obligations (see, Schenectady Sav. Bank v Ashton, 205 App Div 781, 782; 2 Jones, Mortgages § 920).
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
