REDELICK v. WILLIFORD


240 A.D.2d 388 (1997)

658 N.Y.S.2d 1024

Mitchell Redelick, Respondent, v. Barry W. Williford et al., Appellants, and Eliz Chakrian et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 2, 1997


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

To change venue as a matter of right on the ground that the county designated was not proper (see, CPLR 510 [1]), a defendant is required to serve a demand for change of place of trial pursuant to CPLR 511 (a). The appellants failed to comply with this requirement. Although that branch of their motion could have been granted in the court's discretion (see, Aureliano v Hunt-Wesson...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases