THOMAS v. COOK DRILLING CORP.

No. 96-873.

79 Ohio St.3d 547 (1997)

THOMAS, APPELLANT, v. COOK DRILLING CORP. ET AL.; HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 1, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chesley Co., L.P.A., and D. Arthur Rabourn, for appellant.

Earl, Warburton, Adams & Davis and Dick M. Warburton, Jr., for appellee.


PFEIFER, J.

This case is less about choice of law regarding subrogation rights than it is about how an eleventh-hour filing of a motion to intervene can affect the merit of the motion. When viewing the situation as a whole, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Hartford's motion to intervene.

Civ.R. 24(A)(2) states:

"(A) Intervention of Right. Upon timely application anyone shall be permitted to intervene in an action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases