1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 304 N.J.
  5. 304 N.J. Super. 322 (1997)
 

COUNTY OF MORRIS v. RIVERVIEW CONDO., INC.

304 N.J. Super. 322 (1997)

COUNTY OF MORRIS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RIVERVIEW CONDOMINIUMS, INC., NEW JERSEY PUBLIC ADVOCATE, MORRIS COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, MORRIS COUNTY FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL AND TOWNSHIP OF MORRIS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND COLLINSVILLE CIVIC AND IMPROVEMENT LEAGUE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. COUNTY OF MORRIS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RIVERVIEW CONDOMINIUMS, INC., NEW JERSEY PUBLIC ADVOCATE, MORRIS COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, MORRIS COUNTY FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL AND COLLINSVILLE CIVIC AND IMPROVEMENT LEAGUE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND TOWNSHIP OF MORRIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 23, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lenora M. Lapidus argued the cause for the Collinsville Civic and Improvement League, appellant in A-4420-94T2 and respondent in A-5203-94T2 (Crummy, Del Deo, Dolan, Griffinger & Vecchione, attorneys; Ms. Lapidus and Lawrence S. Lustberg, on the brief).

John M. Mills, III argued the cause for the Township of Morris, respondent in A-4420-94T2 and appellant in A-5203-94T2 (Mills & Mills, attorneys; Charles T. Hock and Mr. Mills, on the brief).

Edward J. Buzak, Special Counsel, argued the cause for the County of Morris, respondent in A-4420-94T2 and A-5203-94T2, (Ronald Kevitz, Morris County Counsel, and Mr. Buzak, attorneys; Messrs. Buzak and Kevitz, with Debra S. Weisberg, on the brief).

No briefs were filed by any other party.

Before Judges HAVEY, BROCHIN and KESTIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KESTIN, J.A.D.

The Collinsville Civic and Improvement League (League) and the Township of Morris (Township), defendants in separate actions brought by the County of Morris (County), appeal from a judgment entered by the trial court on March 18, 1995. We consolidate the appeals for the purposes of this opinion. The issues on appeal were adjudicated by the trial court in an order entered on October 31, 1994, but other questions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases