STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. 96-1821-CR.

214 Wis.2d 412 (1997)

570 N.W.2d 892

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Roosevelt WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided October 28, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Melinda Swartz, assistant state public defender. There was oral argument by Melinda A. Swartz.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James Doyle, attorney general, and Donald D. Weinstein, assistant attorney general. There was oral argument by Warren D. Weinstein.

Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Schudson and Curley, JJ.


SCHUDSON, J.

Roosevelt Williams appeals from the judgment of conviction, following his guilty plea, for possession with intent to deliver cocaine. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. He contends that, under Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325 (1990), the police failed to sufficiently corroborate information from an anonymous telephone tip and, therefore, that the police did

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases