1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 118 F.3d
  5. 118 F.3d 502 (1997)
 

U.S. v. RITTER

No. 97-1182.

118 F.3d 502 (1997)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jay Daniel RITTER, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided July 22, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Redford (briefed), Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Henry A. Martin, Fed. Public Defender, Howard W. Gillingham (briefed), Federal Public Defenders Office, Grand Rapids, MI, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: KEITH, KENNEDY and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal Defendant-Appellant Jay Daniel Ritter challenges a condition of his supervised release requiring him to notify his present and future employers about his conviction for embezzlement from a former employer. The district court adequately found that the requirement was reasonably related to the dual objectives of promoting Ritter's rehabilitation and of protecting the public; we therefore affirm.

I. BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases