Per Curiam.
Our evidentiary analysis is hampered by ambiguity in both the commission's order and Dr. Fallon's supplemental report, which ultimately obscures the scope of our review. Three aspects of these documents are particularly confusing.
First, it is unclear whether the commission also found claimant able to return to his former position of employment. While the commission's order specified that maximum medical improvement had occurred, it also...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
