SERRANO v. GIBSON


304 N.J. Super. 314 (1997)

MARIA AND SOLY SERRANO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JOHN C. GIBSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND EDGAR SERRANO AND JOHN DOE (NAME BEING FICTITIOUS), DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 23, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl H. Hadigian, attorney for appellants (Mr. Hadigian, on the letter brief).

Zucker, Facher and Zucker, attorneys for respondent John C. Gibson (Roger C. Wilson, on the letter brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, CONLEY and WALLACE.


The opinion of the court was delivered by CONLEY, J.A.D.

In Chatman v. Hall, 128 N.J. 394, 419-20, 608 A.2d 263 (1992), the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the ninety-day notice requirement of the Tort Claims Act was not applicable to claims against public employees. See Williams v. Adams, 189 N.J.Super. 196, 198-99, 459 A.2d 707...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases