1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 300 N.J.
  5. 300 N.J. Super. 314 (1997)
 

SCARDIGLI v. BOR. OF HADDONFIELD ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENT

300 N.J. Super. 314 (1997)

DENNIS M. SCARDIGLI, M.D., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF HADDONFIELD ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT; VIRGINIA CUMMINS; NASHAT R. KALLEENY AND CLAIRE A. KALLEENY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 30, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald P. Craig argued the cause for appellant.

Daniel J. DiStasi argued the cause for respondent Borough of Haddonfield Zoning Board of Adjustment (Green, Lundgren & Ryan, P.C., attorneys; William L. Lundgren, III, on the brief).

Peter M. Rhodes argued the cause for respondents Virginia Cummins, Nashat R. Kalleeny and Claire A. Kalleeny (Cahill, Wilinski and Cahill, attorneys; Mr. Rhodes, of counsel; Douglas M. Joyce, on the brief).

Before Judges BAIME and PAUL G. LEVY.

PAUL G. LEVY, J.A.D.

When the board of adjustment granted certain bulk variances to the contract purchasers of an undersized lot within 200 feet of plaintiff's residence, permitting construction of a house on that lot, plaintiff brought an action in lieu of prerogative writs in the Law Division. The judge ruled for the defendants (the lot owner, the owner's contract purchaser and the board) and plaintiff appeals.

Virginia Cummins is the owner of Lot 8, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases