1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 300 N.J.
  5. 300 N.J. Super. 299 (1997)
 

GLICK v. BARCLAYS DE ZOETE WEDD, INC.

300 N.J. Super. 299 (1997)

FRANCINE GLICK AND ANNETTE KRAUS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, AND KRISTINE HERGENROTHER, PLAINTIFF, v. BARCLAYS DE ZOETE WEDD, INC., BARCLAYS DE ZOETE WEDD, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GROUP, BARCLAYS DE ZOETE WEDD, LTD., AND LASLO GROSS, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 28, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Judith E. Rodner argued the cause for appellants Jonathan D. Strum and David Scott.

Kevin Jespersen argued the cause for respondents (Slattery McElwee & Jespersen, attorneys).

Before Judges LONG, SKILLMAN and A.A. RODRIGUEZ.

The opinion of this court was delivered by LONG, P.J.A.D.

In June, 1992, plaintiffs, Francine Glick and Annette Kraus, retained Jonathan D. Strum, an attorney licensed to practice law in the District of Columbia and the State of New York, to represent them in an employment discrimination action against their former employer and related companies, defendants, Barclays De Zoete Wedd, Inc., Barclays De Zoete Wedd — Information Technology Group, Barclays De Zoete...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases