Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant claims that his pleas were involuntary because he had been under the influence of marihuana at the time of the pleas. The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in rejecting the defendant's claim, based on its own observation (see, People v Pica,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.