DOE v. GREATER N.Y. BLOOD PROGRAM


304 N.J. Super. 287 (1997)

JANE DOE, AN INFANT, THROUGH HER GUARDIANS AD LITEM, MR. JOHN DOE AND MRS. SUSAN DOE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE GREATER NEW YORK BLOOD PROGRAM, A/K/A THE NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 28, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George T. Baxter argued the cause for appellant.

Peter L. Korn argued the cause for respondent (McDonough, Korn, Eichhorn & Boyle, attorneys for respondent; Mr. Korn and Roger K. Solymosy, of counsel; Wilfred P. Coronato on the brief).

Before Judges LONG, A.A. RODRIGUEZ and CUFF.


The opinion of the court was delivered by LONG, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff, Jane Doe, instituted this action against defendant, the Greater New York Blood Program, after she acquired the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) through a blood transfusion she received in February, 1982. During the course of the proceedings, plaintiff filed a motion to compel additional discovery and defendant filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. The trial judge granted summary judgment in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases