Respondent's defense of legal malpractice was properly dismissed for failure to adduce any evidence to support his allegations that petitioner was negligent in its evaluation of the marital assets, or even that but for the alleged negligence respondent would have achieved a better result than that obtained in the settlement (see, Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
LUNNEY & CROCCO v. WOLFE
243 A.D.2d 348 (1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 164
Lunney & Crocco, Respondent, v. Michael Wolfe, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 21, 1997
October 21, 1997
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.