MATTER OF LONGO v. LOEFFLER


242 A.D.2d 348 (1997)

661 N.Y.S.2d 53

In the Matter of Nicholas A. Longo et al., Respondents, v. Mary G. Loeffler et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

August 20, 1997


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The opportunity to ballot remedy is to be used only in exceptional cases where the defects in the designating petition are technical in nature (see, Matter of Plunkett v Mahoney, 76 N.Y.2d 848). The failure to timely file a certificate of authorization, which was required in order for there to be a valid designating petition in the instant matter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases