Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs assert that they have an easement by prescription over a portion of the defendants' adjacent property. The defendants failed to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, as the plaintiffs raised issues of fact as to whether their use was hostile to that of the former owners during the prescriptive period (see, Van Deusen v McManus,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.