Appellant's assertion that he thought his answer would be served along with his mother's, without explaining exactly what led him to this belief or submitting an affidavit from his mother explaining her involvement with his answer, is insufficient to excuse his default in appearance. Nor does appellant set forth a meritorious defense in asserting that plaintiff consented to the payments made on his behalf from the trust by his successor trustee, without submitting any supporting...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
