ESPOSITO v. TOWNSHIP OF EDISON


306 N.J. Super. 280 (1997)

JOSEPH S. ESPOSITO, ALLEN HERMAN, DAVID OROSZ, MICHAEL BURZINSKI, ROBERT ZUBER, GARY THOMAS AND ADAM TIETCHEN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF EDISON AND TOWNSHIP OF EDISON POLICE DEPARTMENT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 16, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter W. Till argued the cause for appellants (Wilf & Silverman, attorneys; Mr. Till, of counsel and on the brief with Jay A. Weissman).

Louis N. Rainone argued the cause for respondents (Karcher & Rainone, attorneys; Mr. Rainone, of counsel and on the brief with Kristin L. Baldwin).

Before Judges PRESSLER, CONLEY and CARCHMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs, seven patrolmen employed by the defendant, Township of Edison, appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their age-discrimination complaint in which they asserted that the Township's criteria for promotion to police sergeant disparately treated or disparately impacted upon patrolmen over the age of forty. Having carefully reviewed the motion record, we are persuaded that plaintiffs failed to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases