The motion court properly determined that paragraphs Fifth and Seventh of the 1992 Shareholders Agreement permitted inter vivos transfers among family members but prevented testamentary transfers by requiring the estate of any stockholder holding shares in the plaintiff company to sell them back to that company. Since the terms of the 1992 Shareholders Agreement were clear and unambiguous, the motion court properly rejected extrinsic evidence that was intended to add to or...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
