1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 112 F.3d
  5. 112 F.3d 473 (1997)
 

ROWE v. DROR

No. 96-1304.

112 F.3d 473 (1997)

Stanton J. ROWE, Appellant, v. Michael DROR and Paul Trescony, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 21, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George H. Gerstman, Gerstman, Ellis & McMillin, Ltd., Chicago, Illinois, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Terrence W. McMillin.

Bruce M. Collins, Mathews, Woodbridge & Collins, P.A., Princeton, New Jersey, argued for appellees. Of counsel were Ronald Gould, Glen E. Books, Scott N. Bernstein, Mathews, Woodbridge & Collins, P.A., and Daniel W. Latham, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and RADER, Circuit Judge.

RADER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a final decision in Interference No. 103,157. The interference involves United States Patent Application No. 07/865,781, filed by Stanton J. Rowe (Rowe) with a priority date of March 14, 1989 and assigned to Cordis Corp. (Rowe application), and United States Patent No. 5,102,402, issued to Michael Dror and Paul Trescony (collectively, Dror) based on an application filed on January 4, 1991 and assigned to Medtronic, Inc...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases