1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 303 N.J.
  5. 303 N.J. Super. 280 (1997)
 

DI BERNARD v. GREAT ATL. & PAC. TEA CO.

303 N.J. Super. 280 (1997)

LEONARD DI BERNARD, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 18, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph V. Wallace argued the cause for appellant Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company (Hack, Piro, O'Day, Merklinger, Wallace & McKenna, attorneys; Mr. Wallace, of counsel and on the brief).

Michael J. Rowland argued the cause for respondent Leonard Di Bernard (Mr. Rowland, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, STERN and WECKER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by STERN, J.A.D.

This is an appeal from an order entered on May 30, 1996 requiring respondent employer to "continue to provide all necessary medical treatment" for petitioner's previously assessed compensable injury. The order was based upon the Judge of Compensation's written decision on a "motion for medical and temporary disability benefits."

It is undisputed that petitioner sustained a work-related injury on July...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases