FIRST BANK v. MASCRETE, INC.

No. 96-907.

79 Ohio St.3d 503 (1997)

FIRST BANK OF MARIETTA, Appellee, v. MASCRETE, INC. ET AL.; ROSLOVIC & PARTNERS, INC., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 1, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emens, Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter and Gene W. Holliker, for appellee.

Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur and Brian L. Buzby, for appellant.


Submitted April 2, 1997 at the Athens County Session.

MOYER, C.J.

The question presented in this case is whether a contempt hearing that results in a money judgment can be considered a trial for purposes of a Civ.R. 59 motion for a new trial. For the reasons that follow, we hold that it can, and we therefore reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

App.R. 4(A) provides that a notice of appeal must be filed, generally, within thirty days of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases