AETNA LIFE & CAS. v. CATALANO


236 A.D.2d 342 (1997)

654 N.Y.S.2d 574

Aetna Life & Casualty, Respondent, v. Dana Catalano et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 3, 1997


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendants' contention, the underinsured motorist provision of the insurance policy at issue is subject to only one reasonable interpretation (see, Goldman & Sons v Hanover Ins. Co., 80 N.Y.2d 986). The policy permits either party to demand a trial de novo where, as here, the amount of the arbitration award...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases