1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 237 A.D.2d
  5. 237 A.D.2d 332 (1997)
 

JANNACE v. BOEGGEMAN

237 A.D.2d 332 (1997)

655 N.Y.S.2d 442

Mary A. Jannace, Respondent, v. Jane Boeggeman et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 10, 1997

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' cross motion for summary judgment inasmuch as they have failed to establish entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557).

The defendants' remaining contentions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases