Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the medical evidence submitted by the plaintiff in opposition to the motion, consisting of Dr. Kathleen Watson's affidavit, raised a triable issue of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]) as to whether the plaintiff suffered a "significant limitation" and thus sustained a serious injury, as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Beckett v Conte,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.