TEAMSTERS NAT. NEG. COMM. v. CHURCHILL TRUCK LINES

No. 96-3386.

121 F.3d 447 (1997)

TEAMSTERS NATIONAL FREIGHT INDUSTRY NEGOTIATING COMMITTEE, on Behalf of TEAMSTER LOCAL UNIONS WITH CHURCHILL TRUCK LINES CONTRACTS; Virgil Howe; Gary Southers; John Hogan; Rosetta G. Cavan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHURCHILL TRUCK LINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided August 15, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. McCall, Washington, DC, argued (Paula J. Caira, Washington, DC, Kevin F. Fagan, St. Louis, MO, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellants.

Robert J. Harrop, Kansas City, MO, argued (Michael S. Dodig, Kansas City, MO, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before FAGG, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

In this class action case, appellant Teamsters National Freight Industry Negotiating Committee ("Teamsters"), among others, contends that appellee Churchill Truck Lines, Inc. ("Churchill") violated the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2109 (1994) (the "WARN Act"), when the company failed to give sixty days notice before permanently closing its trucking operations. Churchill concedes that it did not comply with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases