OSBORNE v. CHAPMAN

No. C0-96-2216.

562 N.W.2d 1 (1997)

Randy L. OSBORNE, et al., Respondents, v. Richard CHAPMAN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted June 11, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Todd W. Foss, Stefanson, Plambeck & Foss, Moorhead, for Respondents.

Thomas F. Ascher, Cosgrove, Flynn & Gaskins, P.L.L.P., for Appellant.

Considered and decided by LANSING, P.J., and CRIPPEN and FOLEY, JJ.


OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge.

Appellant Richard Chapman challenges a district court's entry of judgment in favor of respondent Randy Osborne on Osborne's negligence claim. Chapman argues the district court erred in (1) concluding Osborne's claim against him for lost rent was not barred and (2) awarding Osborne the expenses he incurred in pursuing his insurance claim. We reverse.

FACTS

Randy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases