1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 78 Ohio
  5. 78 Ohio St.3d 483 (1997)
 

KING DEV. CO. v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BD. OF REVISION

Nos. 96-541, 96-542 and 96-545.

78 Ohio St.3d 483 (1997)

KING DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. CHATTERTON CLUB, L.P., APPELLANT, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. C.O.A. HOUSING, INC., APPELLANT, v. VAN WERT COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 21, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Todd W. Sleggs, for appellants King Development Co., Crofton Partners I, Crofton Partners II, Chatterton Club, L.P., and C.O.A. Housing, Inc.

James R. Gorry, Assistant County Prosecutor, for appellees Franklin County Board of Revision and Franklin County Auditor and Van Wert County Board of Revision and Van Wert Auditor.

Teaford, Rich, Coffman & Wheeler, Jeffrey A. Rich and Karol Cassell Fox, for appellees Board of Education of the Reynoldsburg City School District Board of Education and the Groveport Madison Local School District Board of Education.

Sua sponte, the causes are consolidated. The orders of the Board of Tax Appeals are affirmed on the authority of Sharon Village Ltd. v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Revision (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 479, 678 N.E.2d 932, decided today.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases