Per Curiam.
The commission's order identifies the evidence that it considered in reaching its decision. Absent from this list is evidence from the commission's rehabilitation division, which includes reports from Drs. Tecklenburg and Bensonhaver. This omission implies that the commission did not examine this evidence. State ex rel. Fultz v. Indus. Comm. (1994),
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.