The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence, which demonstrated that the undercover officer gave a detailed and accurate description of defendant to the backup team, which apprehended him minutes later, recovering his nearby stash of crack vials and large amounts of money. Issues of credibility and reliability of identification testimony were properly placed before the jury and we see no reason to disturb its determinations...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
