STATE v. HAMMAD

No. 95-2669.

212 Wis.2d 343 (1997)

569 N.W.2d 68

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Eyad H. HAMMAD, Defendant-Appellant. ONE 1986 BMW 2-DOOR, VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER WBAAB5401C9691032, Defendant-(In T.Ct.).

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided July 15, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the brief of Andrew M. Spheeris of Milwaukee.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Maureen McGlynn Flanagan, assistant attorney general.

Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Curley, JJ.


CURLEY, J.

Eyad H. Hammad appeals from a civil forfeiture order confiscating his automobile and from an order denying his motion for reconsideration. Hammad argues that the forfeiture action violated the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Although Hammad is correct that the forfeiture of his vehicle implicates the protections guaranteed by the Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause, we conclude that, after applying...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases