1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 243 A.D.2d
  5. 243 A.D.2d 311 (1997)
 

MATTER OF MARKBY v. PAINE-WEBBER INC.

243 A.D.2d 311 (1997)

664 N.Y.S.2d 520

In the Matter of Julian Markby, Appellant, v. Paine-Webber Incorporated et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 14, 1997

There is no merit to petitioner's claim that the arbitration award violates the public policy against forfeiture of earned wages. Certainly, there is nothing on the face of the documents defining the compensation payable under respondent's Stock Award and Incentive Compensation Plans to indicate that the compensation petitioner seeks to recover was other than wholly discretionary (see, Weiner v Diebold Group,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases