Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the testimony of the photographic identification should have been suppressed as unduly suggestive, since the background of his photograph was much lighter than the other photographs in the array. This contention is without merit since it cannot be said that this difference tainted the photographic array (see, People v Guzman,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.