DOE BY ROE v. ORANGEBURG CTY. SCH. DIST.

No. 2765.

329 S.C. 221 (1997)

495 S.E.2d 230

Jane DOE, by her Guardian ad Litem, Mary ROE, and Mary Roe, individually, Respondents-Appellants, v. ORANGEBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2, Appellant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided December 8, 1997

Rehearing Denied January 23, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Preston F. McDaniel, Columbia, and Clyde C. Dean, Jr., Orangeburg, for respondents-appellants.

William E. Craver, III, and Bruce E. Davis, both of Davis, Craver, Hagood & Kerr, Charleston, for appellant-respondent.


HEARN, Judge:

In this action for negligent supervision, Orangeburg County School District No. 2 (the school district) appeals from a jury verdict in favor of Jane Doe, by her Guardian ad Litem Mary Roe, and Mary Roe individually. Doe and Roe cross-appeal, arguing that the jury's verdict was inadequate and thus the trial judge should have granted a new trial nisi additur. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

On February...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases