PEOPLE v. ODIOT


242 A.D.2d 308 (1997)

661 N.Y.S.2d 969

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Demetrius Odiot, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

August 11, 1997


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the trial court improperly restricted his cross-examination of a prosecution witness is not preserved for appellate review, since the grounds raised at trial differ from those raised on appeal (see, People v Qualls, 55 N.Y.2d 733; People v Dunbar, 145 A.D.2d 501

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases