LaROCCA v. BAYWOOD AT NOYACK, INC.


241 A.D.2d 308 (1997)

659 N.Y.S.2d 40

N. Dante Larocca et al., Plaintiffs, v. Baywood at Noyack, Inc., et al., Defendants. Hayt, Hayt & Landau, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward H. Honig et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents. Kaufman, Feiner, Yamin, Gildin & Robbins, et al., Nonparty Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

July 1, 1997


The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying third-party plaintiff's motion for reasonable expenses for the third-party defendants' failure to respond to the notices to admit under CPLR 3123 and choosing to defer that matter, as provided by statute, to the conclusion of the trial. Nor was it an abuse of its discretion to deny sanctions authorized under 22 NYCRR part 130 or under CPLR 3103, or to otherwise order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases