WESTIN TUCSON HOTEL v. DEPT. OF REV.

No. 1 CA-TX 96-0007.

188 Ariz. 360 (1997)

936 P.2d 183

WESTIN TUCSON HOTEL CO., a Delaware corporation, dba Westin La Paloma Hotel and La Paloma Country Club, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE of Arizona DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Pima County, a body politic and corporate, Ed Moore, Dan Eckstrom, Mike Boyd, Paul Marsh, and Raul Grijalva, as members of the Pima County Board of Supervisors, Rick Lyons, in his capacity as Pima County Assessor, and James L. Kirk, in his capacity as Pima County Treasurer, Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department T.

April 8, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Munger and Munger, P.L.C. by John F. Munger, Mark E. Chadwick, Tucson, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Stephen D. Neely, Pima County Attorney by Peter E. Pearman, Deputy County Attorney, Civil Division, Tucson, Grant Woods, Arizona Attorney General by Frank Boucek, III, Assistant Attorney General, Tax Division, Phoenix, for Defendants-Appellees.


OPINION

NOYES, Presiding Judge.

Westin Tucson Hotel Co. ("Westin") appeals from the Tax Court's summary judgment ruling in favor of the State of Arizona Department of Revenue ("DOR") and Pima County ("County")1 on Westin's refund claims. Westin also appeals the denial of its Motion for Sanctions. Finding no error, we affirm.

I.

On May 7, 1993 Westin filed its 1993 State of Arizona Business Personal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases