1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 235 A.D.2d
  5. 235 A.D.2d 311 (1997)
 

DOLGOFF v. PROJECTAVISION, INC.

235 A.D.2d 311 (1997)

653 N.Y.S.2d 111

Eugene Dolgoff, Respondent-Appellant, v. Projectavision, Inc., et al., Appellants-Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

January 23, 1997

We agree with the Supreme Court that defendants, on this pre-answer dismissal motion, have failed to "definitively dispose of the claim[s]" (Demas v 325 W. End Ave. Corp., 127 A.D.2d 476, 477). Many factual questions remain unresolved as to whether defendants breached the contract agreements at issue herein. Moreover, as in Mulder v Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette (

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases