1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 239 A.D.2d
  5. 239 A.D.2d 303 (1997)
 

MATTER OF NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIG.

239 A.D.2d 303 (1997)

658 N.Y.S.2d 858

In the Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation. Joseph W. Smith et al., Respondents, v. Rapid-American Corporation, Appellant. In the Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation. Ronnie Adcock et al., Respondents, v. Rapid-American Corporation, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 29, 1997

The task of determining whether an action should be dismissed based on forum non conveniens (CPLR 327) is committed to the sound discretion of the motion court. Limiting our review to the facts and circumstances of the present case, under this standard we find no improvident exercise of discretion (Yoshida Print. Co. v Aiba, 213 A.D.2d 275). We have considered defendant's remaining arguments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases